The Oldskool Software Collectibles Condition Grading Scale
Version 1.2
Quickstart: What do these letters mean?
If someone is trying to sell you software and referred you to this scale, and you just want to know what G, NM, etc. means, here is the quick breakdown from best to worst:
- MS: Mint Sealed
- NM: Near Mint
- F: Fine
- VG: Very Good
- G: Good
- ED: Excess Defects
We encourage you to read further to Condition Grades so that you understand exactly what the difference is between Mint and Near Mint is, what Fine means, etc. Your definition of Very Good may not match someone else's definition, so please read the full condition descriptions so that you and the seller are on the same page.
Background:
The world of software collectibles have been a hobby since the 1990s. Like any collectibles hobby, items can be worth a lot of money if they are in good condition. However, not everybody uses the same language when it comes to describing the condition of an item; some consider "Mint" to be still sealed, while others use that term for unsealed items. Inexact language can lead to disputes over how much items are worth.
A group of software collectors believed there was a better way to do this, and created a standard grading scale and specification for cataloging software for collection lists. This system is officially in place at MobyGames.com, but it is our hope that it is embraced by the collector community and used universally to describe item condition. Through widespread acceptance of this scale, we hope to eliminate misconceptions and confusion in the software collectible community. This document describes The Oldskool Software collectibles Condition Grading Scale and its use and application. For brevity, the condition grading scale will be abbreviated as "Oldskool Grading Scale" throughout the remainder of this text. Also included at the end of the document are some frequently-asked questions, and an example collector's list to illustrate the system in use.
Item Breakdown:
Before describing the actual scale, it is important to define how the scale itself is used. A common practice for new collectors is to assess the overall quality of an item and give it a singular value. This may save the collector time, but creates confusion for other collectors attempting to view his list. This is because not everyone values certain aspects of an item the same. For example, one collector may value the condition of the box above all else, while another may value the manual and included trinkets/props/feelies higher than the box. Because of differing opinions of value, it is usually inappropriate to give items one overall grade.
The solution to this is to apply a grade to as many pieces of the item that are relevant. This creates more work, but is the only way to ensure accuracy and avoid unintentionally misleading people who read your lists. For example, the most common pieces of a software collectible are:
- Box/Packaging
- Original Media
- Manual
- Reference Sheet
- Catalog
- Registration Card
- Additional Items (listed individually)
The more pieces that are graded, the better the representation of the item. So while you can get away with a single grade for the entire item, a suggested minimum would be two grades: One for the Box/Packaging, and another for all other materials contained in that item.
Note: You can still use and advertise the Oldskool Grading Scale if you only list a single grade for the overall item -- but it is highly recommended that you provide at least two grades (usually one grade for the box, and another for its contents). Other collectors will thank you for it.
Condition Grades:
The following are the official condition grades of the Oldskool Grading Scale. The possible conditions an item can be in are, from best to worst:
| Grade | Abbr. | Description |
| Mint Sealed | MS | No noticable defects and sealed in original factory or store shrinkwrap or sticker. The best grade possible. |
| Near Mint | NM | No noticable defects, but not sealed. |
| Fine | F | One or two slight defects (small scratch, slight worn corner on box, etc.) that prevent a Near Mint rating. |
| Very Good | VG | More than one or two slight defects (slight crease in manual, all corners slightly worn, etc.). Still in acceptable condition. |
| Good | G | More severe defects (box slightly torn or crushed; noticable wear on media, manual, or other materials). Acceptable only if the item is hard to find or highly desired by the collector. |
| Excess Defects | ED | Excessive and/or unusable defects (crushed, ripped, or sheared box; torn manual pages; box or manual written on in marker, etc.). Acceptable only if the item is wanted for non-collectible purposes (like actually playing the game) or for "parts". |
Each grade can also have a modifier associated with it:
| Modifier | Abbr. | Description |
| Sealed | S | Sealed with original factory (or store) shrinkwrap or sticker. Not to be confused with a re-wrapped previously-opened box. |
| Compressed | C | Package has been crushed, compressed, or has imploded due to constrictive wrap. |
| Torn Wrap | T | Sealed package has tears in the shrinkwrap. |
| Item Missing | IM | Package is incomplete, missing one or more items from the original distribution that detract from its gameplay or collectible value. Examples of missing items would include the wishstone from Wishbringer, the cloth map from Ultima 2, etc. |
| Missing Minor Component | MMC | Package is missing a minor component. Minor components are any included pieces that don't detract from the game playing experience. Examples of minor components would include warranty or registration cards, product catalogs, one of two identical items (like pens), a sheet of graph paper from an otherwise complete pad, etc. |
| Bad Media | BM | Media (diskette, CDROM, tape, etc.) is known to be bad or defective. |
Modifier examples:
- An unopened copy of a title in Fine condition would be called Fine, Sealed or F (S).
- A copy of Ultima 6 in Very Good condition but missing the moonstone would be called Very Good, Item Missing, or VG (IM).
- A package that misses Mint Sealed condition because the wrap is torn would be Near Mint, Torn Wrap or NM (T).
- A heavily-played, slightly beat-up copy of MULE that is missing the registration card and the diskettes have ceased to work would be Good, Missing Minor Components and Bad Media or G (MMC, BM).
Examples:
Long form: Ultima Underworld, open and used item in good condition:
Title: Ultima Underworld
Year: 1993
Platform: DOS
Box/Packaging: Very Good
Original Media: Fine
Manual: Very Good
Catalog: Near Mint
Reference Sheet: Very Good
Registration Card: Item Missing
Additional Items: Near Mint
Comments: Has "Best RPG of 1993" sticker on front box. Additional items are a cloth bag with metal "runes".
Short form, multiple items:
Tass Times in Tonetown (PC): Box G, Media F, Manual G, Registration Card ED (handwriting), "Newspaper" prop F
X-Car Experimental Racing (PC): Box MS
Ancient Land of Ys (PC): Box G, Media F, Manual G, Registration Card IM
Archon (C64): Box NM, Media NM, Manual VG, Registration Card NM
Abbreviated form, multiple items: (Legend is Box/Inside Materials)
Ancient Land of Ys: G/VG
Under a Killing Moon: VG/F
Pinball Construction Set: VG/G
Music Construction Set: VG/G
Dr. J and Larry Bird go One on One: NM/NM
Daemonsgate: MS
Abbreviated form, multiple items with modifiers:
Ancient Land of Ys: G (C, MMC)
Pinball Construction Set: VG (MMC, BM)
Music Construction Set: F
Dr. J and Larry Bird go One on One: NM (T)
These are just suggested list templates; you are free to use whatever format you choose. The Oldskool Grading Scale is a specification, but you can implement that specification any way you like. Note that, for all forms suggested above, there was only one grade listed for Sealed items. Since the item was never opened, the condition of the contents cannot be determined (although you can make some assumptions from the condition of the box).
Frequently-Asked Questions:
Q: Will the number of grades change?
A: No. Many hours of thought were put into what appreciable differing grades of condition could be (as related to software items). Unless an extremely strong and convincing argument is made, they will never change.
Q: Why only six grades?
A: More (or less) grades wouldn't describe an item's condition any better than the grades provided. We deliberately created granular grades for the best conditions and coarse grades (only two) for poor conditions. This was done to best serve the needs of collectors without overwhelming them. Also, the more grades you have, the more their implementation is subject to debate -- which is precisely what the Oldskool Grading Scale is meant to eliminate.
Q: Why isn't "Rare" on the grading scale?
A: "Rare" isn't an indication of condition; it's an indication of availability. There was a rarity guide at some point in the 2000s called the CURIOUS scale, but it became defunct.
Q: Can I add my own grades using this system? I've been using "Pristine" and "Good Plus" in my own lists and want to keep doing so.
A: No! That goes against the whole idea of standardizing condition grades; the purpose of the system is to map conditions to terms that everyone can universally use and agree upon. Adding your own terms deviates from the scale, and just confuses other collectors. If you add your own terms, you cannot advertise that you're utilizing the Oldskool Grading Scale.
Q: I have a few items where the box is okay but the shrinkwrap is in really poor condition, and I want to document that. How can I do that when the grades apply to the box?
A: The proper usage is to qualify the wrap after the main package grade. For example, a Mint Sealed package with dirty/yellowed/tattered/etc. wrap could be listed as "MS (wrap: G)". Many thanks to Alexander Zöller for the suggestion.
Acknowledgements and Addendum:
This document and its contents were originally created by Jim Leonard, Hugh Falk, C. E. Forman, and AvatarTom. This scale was hosted at mobygames.com for several years, and is informally referred to as the MobyScale. The permanent location for this grading scale is at: "http://www.oldskool.org/info/MobyScale"
This grading scale was authored by Jim Leonard, based on a scale created by Hugh Falk, which in turn was based on a record album grading scale of unknown origin. Any questions, comments, or suggestions should be directed to the author. You are free to copy, translate, reformat, and retransmit this text as long as these notices are included and the content is left unchanged.
This grading scale is officially released to the software collectibles community. Its use is highly encouraged, as long as it's not altered. Strict adherence to the scale is what makes it strong and useful; please don't deviate from or otherwise modify it.
"The Oldskool Software Collectibles Condition Grading Scale" is a mouthful, isn't it? :-) It's suggested that you merely tell other collectors, "I'm using the Oldskool Grading Scale."
Many thanks to Hugh Falk, Tom Hlavendy, C. E. Forman, Lee Seitz, and others who provided suggestions that helped shape this scale.
Version history:
- 20201217: Established authorship of the scale. Ownership is currently public domain.
- 20200516: Added "quickstart" at the beginning, as many buyers don't want to read the whole document, but just want to know what the letters mean. Updated some dead links to point to archives. Changed some lists into tables for easier reading.
- 20171210: Reinstated official location/copy; fixed grammar throughout the scale ("collectible" is the correct term to refer to items that people collect and cherish); reformatted and sanitized the HTML formatting; removed note about signing up for the Software Collector's Mailing List.